• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Upgrade form gt28RS to GT2871R?

Wheel House Motorsports

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 27, 2007
29,933
5,968
113
34
SW MT
you got the exhaust bolt combo's setup right. .86 ar exhaust side and the biggest compressor you can get on it.

what are you putting it on?? if your running it on an 800. get a 3071 with a .64 exhaust housing. its amazing how much power it will make. and it will have very linear power.
 
G
Apr 23, 2008
1,576
981
113
2876,, Tell RMS he can borrow one of mine to test with ,, its off season now for me.

Junk the detonation inducing head design.
DNE tried it and lost 3 engines with just small n20 ...
Torroid is your best design for boost to date..

Good luck

Robyn will need clean pants when he dyno tests it !!!!:face-icon-small-ton:face-icon-small-ton
 

CO 2.0

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
4,470
2,994
113
44
Fort Collins, CO
I've gone through significant testing on 1800-2000cc Audi's with all the turbos in this range (audi mech)

The 2876R is a mismatched compressor to turbine cover. Lots more lag without making much more power than a 2871R up top. Best performance for 28series turbos I found was with the 2871R. Still good spool and making great power up top. Actually pushed a 2871R to 35psi on the dyno at 6000ft (with a big azz intercooler) and made 380whp uncorrected on a 2L engine. A 3071R .64 AR will make more power efficiently with better spool than a 2876R. A precision HTA 3076R will make more power than that and spool identical to a 3071R. If it were me I'd either go 2871R or jump up to a 30 series if space allows. Just my $.02
 
G
Apr 23, 2008
1,576
981
113
On the 2 strokes, the response is better with the 2876 than a 2871 .
Why ?

2 strokes NEED large amounts of air to have good response, low turbine rpm and small compressors do NOT provide this.

when we use the MisMatched turbos on 2 strokes we uncover yet another BETTER way to make them respond and make power.

2 strokes NEED backpressure, and demand large compressor flows. so 30 series turbines though nice on 4 strokes are poor choices under 1. liter on a 2 stroke.

Now making 3 hta wheeled 2876 for us, we shall see in sept at Dynotech how they compare.
the shootout will be on a 860 doo, 2876, hta 2876 and 3071 hta.. the goal is 400 @ 36 psi..thats 44 - 46 psi in the pipe


Though 4 strokes don't like these turbos , 2 strokes most certainly do.


lag is part turbine rpm and part airflow UNDER the window of best turbine rpm. these funky " got no home " turbo sizes are just what the good doctor ordered..response on the 800 twin doos is better, 2 psi @ 2800 rpm..2876

2 psi @ 3600 rpm with the 2871.. lest we not forget the reduced charge temps with the larger comp body .

Gus

2 good guys got 2860's from the azzhat halverson,, they wont even build boost period over 7000 feet. not close to enough compressor flow for the current crop of higher port timed 800 from cat and doo..

test test test.. then once you have it perfect.. someone finds another level of performance..:face-icon-small-con
 

CO 2.0

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
4,470
2,994
113
44
Fort Collins, CO
Yes good point. My basis of information is from 4stroke applications, not 2 strokes. If precision makes an HTA wheel for the 2876R then it will be a much more efficient turbo for any application.
 
Last edited:
P

product tester

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2007
868
255
63
53
gus I also found the spool of the 2876 was 1000 rpm lower than the 2871 witch makes the 8 feel like a 1000 on the bottom end, That is why in my kits I have went to the 2876. they make alot more tourqe at low rpm.
 
C

catmanm7

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2007
576
94
28
I will say that I have no problems with my 2876 on my m7 with 800 BB. People are always asking about lag, but I really dont notice any. Maybe gearing helped with that...
This is the only turbo I have ridden, so no comparions with the 2871 etc.
I am glad to see turbo builders trying new things.... better for everyone
 
G
Apr 23, 2008
1,576
981
113
gus I also found the spool of the 2876 was 1000 rpm lower than the 2871 witch makes the 8 feel like a 1000 on the bottom end, That is why in my kits I have went to the 2876. they make alot more tourqe at low rpm.

On the Ice Shain, we can add 20 grams to EACH lever and still run 28 grams in the pins !
rpm climbs over 8700 out the back door too. Love the damn 2876 .

when using the antilag with the bigger turbo we have boost almost at the touch of the throttle, no waiting a second or two for it to start showing boost..

You guys are damn lucky he's out there pushing the envelope too make better drivability a reality..

Now lets see what we come up with for the 1 liter and up stuff.. 88 sounds like a plan....

You basitds are still riding too,,,, I'm jealous as all ,,,,,


Gus
 

Tonysnoo

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 6, 2004
978
277
63
No. Nevada
You basitds are still riding too,,,, I'm jealous as all ,,,,,


Gus

Hey Gus, good to see ya out lurking about. Always intersted in seeing what you think about the dang spinny things.

Those fellows in Utah are still getting snow. Well back on topic.

At Gus's advice I ran a 2876 last year on my M7/1000 big bore. The thing was really responsive right off engagement. It was super quick to boost. Same turbo this year on my 08 800 was lazier on the bottom. port timing????? 2011Pipe????

Still learning!
 
E
Jul 9, 2002
689
112
43
Omak, WA
How about an 800 Rev@405hp@42psi with a 2876.......

I really need to buy a barrel (or three) if 112-114 MON fuel and turn up da boost! Taking donations for a boost test.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Premium Features