• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

PCV vs Bullydog

M
Nov 27, 2007
847
281
63
manitoba, Canada
Hi guys, I'm currently running an SLP stage 4 in my 13 pro, usually in the 2-4k elevation. I find the feeling just a tad on the heavy side. I would also like to be able to make small tuning alterations as I add or remove things from the sled like reeds and so on.

This year I'm thinking of going to an autotune and the PC display screen or the bullydog setup, but I'v never run a bullydog on a 2 stroke

I contacted SLP earlier this week with my concerns and this is how they responded. I'm just looking for any more information anyone can add to this, or possible corrections Thanks

I have removed contact info from their email

Danny,

The bully dog GT module gives us more adjustability than just changing fuel.
We can adjust timing as well as a variety of sensor trim adjustments and
because of this, we have seen noticeable increases in performance. The
downside to the GT module is you are not able to make adjustments to the
map. You can only download our map into the ECU. If you are running our
complete stage kit, then this will be a great option but for those people
who like to mix and match products, building a "calico cat" of sorts where
they need to adjust their own fueling, then you will want to head in the
power commander direction. This will give you the ability to make fuel
adjustments as well as access to tuning tools such as the auto tune, map
switch, LCD screen, etc.
 

Norway

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 29, 2007
1,978
476
83
49
x 2 on controller info.

Bully dog seems to not be for me since it will not allow me to change the map, but PC V and Dobeck has me interested. If PC V had easy in-field tunability, I guess the choice would be clear.

But now it seems like the new AFR+ from Dobeck is a good tool. Wish there was more reviews on it..

Anyone riding these yet?
 
Premium Features